Wednesday, March 10, 2010
About UsContact Us
02 Feb 2010
Pro or Anti Immunisation: What are the consequences?

Immunisation - there has been quite a bit of discussion in the forums regarding its safety and whether it causes significant side-effects.

It can be an emotive subject. But, what are the facts? I did a literature search on immunsiation/vaccination to find some evidence to support the concerns I read about in the forums.

And, I found that in the past 150 years, the world's wealthy nations have successfully controlled - and in some cases, even eliminated - infectious diseases such as cholera and typhoid by ensuring a clean water supply; tuberculosis by good nutrition and pasturisation; and diptheria, polio, measles and rubella by immunisation. The success of infancy and childhood vaccination programs is one of the most effective health interventions of the 20th Century and is credited with helping increase our life expectancy. So, it can't be all bad!

Immunisation has eradicated smallpox; eliminated polio in wealthy nations and reduced the number of measles, mumps, rubella and congenital rubella, diptheria and haemophilus influenza type B (HIB) cases.

Unfortunately, as the incidence of vaccine preventable diseases has declined, concern about the safety of vaccines has increased. It seems that we have forgotten how terrible and fatal many of these illnesses are. Our collective memory has forgotten the high infant mortality rates and disabilities for survivors of these illnesses.

A more recent example of "disease fear" is the terror over Haemophilus Influenza B in the early 1990s. Parents were terrified that their infant would be the 1 in 600 who would contract either HIB menigitis or HIB epiglottitis. Why? Because 1 in 20 of those children would die quickly and suddenly, despite antibiotic treatment. On top of that, 1 in 10 survivors were left deaf and/or neurologically impaired. I remember the fear of parents and the rush to find a vaccination. It was a major public health issue. Consequently, we have now reduced the mortality and morbidity to HIB and become complacent once again.

Fortunately, Australia has a high immunisation rate with approximately 94% of children being vaccinated by 12 months, with only 2 - 3% of parents actively disagreeing or expressing concern about vaccination.

To keep our population safe and eliminate vaccine preventable diseases, we need to have 95% of the population vaccinated - this is called "herd immunity". We vaccinate children to keep those individuals safe as our primary reason, but the bigger picture is the elimination of these diseases in the population. Vaccination is also about the greater good and that's why we continue to actively promote and encourage immunisation to all families in the community as well as try to provide the same good public health measures in developing countries. After all, these people have a right to the same good health as we currently enjoy.

Autism and bowel diseases have been cited as adverse outcomes for some children after being given the Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccine. This myth arose from a 1993 study done by a Dr. Wakefield in the UK. The study made a spurious connection between immunisation and the development of autism and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Over 20 subsequent studies and expert reviews have shown that there is no association between the MMR vaccine and autism or IBD .

In 2004, 10 of the original 13 authors of the study published a statement retracting the original's papers interpretation, stating that the data was insufficient to establish a causal link between MMR vaccine and autism.

Another concern people raise is that immunisations contain aluminium and mercury. To address these fears the mercury has now been removed from vaccines. But, unfortunately for those of us who enjoy seafood, we now get plenty of mercury through global pollutants in the oceans. As for aluminium, if you cook in aluminium pots every day, you are also consuming it through your diet. Aluminuim has been linked with Alzheimers disease, but this is also a tenuous link and has never been proven.

Several of the studies I read discussed reasons for the low uptake of vaccinations in some Australian rural areas and other developed nations. What came through was the attitudes of health professionals including nurses was a factor in why parents decide not to vaccinate. I find this disturbing. We nurses have a duty of care to our clients to be very well informed about these debates for and against vaccination so we can discuss our patients concerns knowledgably and without bias. Parents have a right to make informed decisions.

Having said that, we must also consider the rights of the child. Should a parent have the right to deny their child something that may prevent an illness that causes death or lifelong disability? The child's right to be protected until old enough to choose for themselves is a complex issue, but one I think must be considered in this debate. As a child health nurse, I must advocate for the right of the child and the evidence tells me that a child is at more risk of death or disability than any side effects of immunisation.

To finish - I'd like to offer some comparative risk stats for the MMR vaccine and the natural diseases the MMR immunisation protects against.

  • Convulsions 1:200 for natural disease and 1:1000 for Immunistion
  • Menigitis/encepahalitis 1:200 to 1:5000 for natural disease and 1:1,000,000 for immunisation
  • Thrombocytopenia 1:3000 for natural disease and 1:24,000 for immunisation
  • Death 1:8,000 to 1:10,000 for natural disease and 0 for immunisation.

 

For much more information, research and links about vaccination and immunisation go to the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases. http://www.ncirs.usyd.edu.au.

If you have access to a medical database, your search terms are of course: immunisation and vaccination.



Only registered users can post comments. LOG IN to post your comment.

Comments

hcrowley - says:
Added on - 08 Feb 2010 01:43AM

This is SO Important. Thank goodness for some sensible research instead of old wives tales and nonsense, which just staggers me , in this day and age. As to the comments about the waste of money on H1N1 vaccine. I would like you to come and see my 36 year old son who went from a strong healthy (no underlying diseases) vibrant young man who after contracting swine flu last year, is now severely physically impaired from being on life support for 7 weeks and has now only 1/3 his original lung capacity from fibrosis in his lungs , arythmia, generalised weakness due to muscle wasting, peripheral neuropathy, from nerve damage, short-term memory loss due to the catastrophic illness he suffered, all from swine flu. But don't take my word for it, find some people who have been seriously affected by H1N1 or the relatives of those who died. And i'll bet you won't be able to get your vaccination quick enough! Last year people thought that the Health Dept was making a big thing of this dreadful flu and 190 people died! It makes me very sad that people can be so complacent especially with their children and not get vaccinated. The second wave is coming and it could be you next time. I pray that it won't. We were lucky that we had the ICU and the doctors and nurses that we did, with my son. He could have so very easily died and he came within a hairs breath on more than 1 occasion. He will never be the same again and one year later it could have all been prevented.

Report this comment as inappropriate!
patience - says:
Added on - 04 Feb 2010 10:39AM

Here's the link http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20100203/hl_time/08599195874400

Report this comment as inappropriate!
patience - says:
Added on - 04 Feb 2010 10:34AM

This is in wednesday's news: Lancet climbs down on autism vaccine link
Posted Wed Feb 3, 2010 9:10am AEDT

A British medical journal has retracted a controversial study which suggested a link between autism and the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine known as MMR.

The now-discredited research by Doctor Andrew Wakefield caused vaccination rates to plummet in Britain.

Six years ago The Lancet admitted it was wrong to publish the research, but it has taken the journal 12 years to retract the Wakefield paper.

It emerged that Dr Wakefield failed to disclose that he was being paid to investigate claims that children had been damaged by the MMR vaccine.

It took an in-depth investigation by the General Medical Council to finally convince the journal to formally retract the paper.

The council found Dr Wakefield had been dishonest and irresponsible in his research methods.

-BBC

Report this comment as inappropriate!
kbw - says:
Added on - 03 Feb 2010 02:42PM

too doubt or not too ... This is a medico-vexing and ongoing unresloved matter re vaccinations.
I bow to others of superior knowledge on many subjects, however it neesda to be stated tha'the collective memory' as mentioed above ought to encompass the area of Multi-Nationals vs National and Global Health Care.

Priot too WHO and other collectives, doctors stood together,facts were facts and mass soultions were based on reality, not scared media-hype. It was in print;not web based; you had to go do your readings. Why I put this here is we have just seen how much was over-spent in Australia on H1N1 shots..they remain on the shelf.

Early World Disease warnings as outlined above were required. Aust has strick regulations. If we were to travel o/s we all did require smallpox;gosh you had a nasty scab and ended up with a scare for life! So what! you did what you were told to do by your Nation. Under the Law children can be refused education at schools if they have not been given shots. I fully support this stance.

I support surveys and studies;however I do add these are too small in numbers and age groups. It should be mandatory that all persons gaining Centrelink Payments undergo and be included in surveys..NO OPTIONS MADE OR GIVEN.
And for thoes whom may consider this as an invassion of privacy, IO agree nurses do have a duty of care as do our Elected Members and Health Minister in Federal Parliament.
This is a National affair not State based I suggest

Report this comment as inappropriate!
shoils - says:
Added on - 03 Feb 2010 02:40PM

I would NEVER consider NOT vaccinating my children. I have however seen and heard many mothers speak out against immunisation, and tried to persuade others to boycot vaccines. I get very angry when I see this as the information they have is questionable and they are putting the rest of the population at risk. My levels of antibodies against Rubella when I was pregnant with my 1st daughter where borderline and if I had come into contact with a child with Rubella unknowingly it could of had sever consequences on my unborn daughter.
Vaccines are there to protect us and I really think that they should place emphysis on this and educate parents to be in antenatal classes. They should give parents the stats associated with vaccinating against not vaccinating. Then I think they should see the effects not vaccinating could have, maybe they will change their minds.
Thankfully the pre-school where my daughter is at the moment, their policy is that your child HAS to be vaccinated and you have to provide a copy of their vaccination record when you are enrolling.
I have had to pay for all the vaccines I had given to my daughter but I don't care, you can't put a price on good health.

Report this comment as inappropriate!
hope - says:
Added on - 02 Feb 2010 05:50PM

Well informed Thank you for your research, and knowledge on this subject.
It is true, many parents have not seen the actual diseases, against which children are now being vaccinated.
Thankfully, the majority does vaccinate their children.
We are fortunate to have access to free vaccines.

Report this comment as inappropriate!

Recent Comments

Follow us on Twitter

Sponsors

Me BankContinuing Professional Education Online Members Area Union Shopper Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing